While ChatGPT-4 is a powerful language model that can generate human-like responses, it is not yet capable of competing with human auditors in terms of accuracy. OpenZeppelin, a leading blockchain security firm, noted that ChatGPT-4 was not optimized for this purpose and that AI models specifically trained for auditing would likely be more accurate. Here are the most important points to consider:
1. ChatGPT-4 is not optimized for auditing: While ChatGPT-4 is capable of generating responses that sound human-like, it is not specifically designed for auditing tasks. This means that it may not be able to accurately identify all potential risks or vulnerabilities in a given system.
2. AI models trained for auditing may be more accurate: OpenZeppelin suggests that AI models specifically trained for auditing tasks would likely be more accurate than ChatGPT-4. These models could be trained on large datasets of known vulnerabilities and risks, allowing them to better identify potential issues.
3. Human auditors are still necessary: While AI models may be more accurate than ChatGPT-4, they are not yet capable of replacing human auditors entirely. Human auditors bring a level of expertise and experience that cannot be replicated by AI models alone.
In summary, while ChatGPT-4 is a powerful language model, it is not yet capable of competing with human auditors in terms of accuracy. AI models specifically trained for auditing tasks may be more accurate, but human auditors are still necessary to provide the expertise and experience needed to identify potential risks and vulnerabilities.
