Don’t Be Naive — BlackRock’s ETF Won’t Be Bullish for Bitcoin.

Title: Are Regulators Targeting Crypto-Native Companies to Facilitate BlackRock’s Dominance?


The cryptocurrency industry has witnessed significant growth and innovation in recent years, attracting the attention of both investors and regulators. However, concerns have been raised regarding whether regulators are intentionally stifling crypto-native companies to pave the way for financial giant BlackRock to dominate the industry. This article aims to explore this perspective and shed light on the most crucial points surrounding this topic.

Key Points:

1. Regulatory Scrutiny on Crypto-Native Companies:

Regulators worldwide have intensified their scrutiny of crypto-native companies, focusing on issues such as compliance, security, and investor protection. While some argue that these measures are necessary to safeguard the market, others contend that excessive regulation disproportionately affects smaller players, potentially benefiting larger traditional financial institutions like BlackRock.

2. BlackRock’s Interest in Cryptocurrency:

BlackRock, the world’s largest asset management firm, has shown increasing interest in cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology. The company’s CEO, Larry Fink, has acknowledged the potential of digital assets and expressed a desire to explore investment opportunities in the crypto space. This has led to speculation that regulators may be favoring BlackRock’s entry into the market by imposing stricter regulations on its competitors.

3. Potential Motivations for Regulatory Actions:

Critics argue that regulators may be influenced by various factors when targeting crypto-native companies. These include concerns over consumer protection, money laundering, and market stability. However, some believe that regulators may also be influenced by lobbying efforts from established financial institutions seeking to maintain their dominance in the industry. This raises questions about the fairness and impartiality of regulatory actions.


While it is essential to acknowledge the legitimate reasons behind regulatory scrutiny in the cryptocurrency industry, concerns have been raised about potential biases favoring established financial institutions like BlackRock. The increasing interest of BlackRock in cryptocurrencies, coupled with the intensified regulatory actions against crypto-native companies, has fueled speculation about a potential agenda to facilitate BlackRock’s dominance. As the industry continues to evolve, it is crucial for regulators to strike a balance between fostering innovation and ensuring market integrity, without unduly favoring any particular player.